Juror stress: identification and intervention.

نویسندگان

  • T B Feldmann
  • R A Bell
چکیده

The impact of stressful life events has been studied extensively in the psychiatric literature. Crisis debriefing techniques have been shown to be effective in decreasing psychiatric morbidity following exposure to these stressful situations. Stress reactions and crisis debriefing have been reported in many groups including combat veterans, survivors of natural disasters and accidents, victims of violence, and law enforcement and emergency personnel who respond to such events. One group that has not been studied extensively is jurors who are exposed to potentially disturbing material introduced as evidence in trials. Stress reactions in jurors and the value of debriefing of juries have been described by us in an earlier work. This paper describes debriefing sessions with three juries exposed to emotionally distressing material during murder trials. In comparing our experiences with these sets of jurors a number of common reactions were identified. These are discussed and a model for jury debriefing is presented.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Juror reactions to jury duty: perceptions of the system and potential stressors.

Jurors were surveyed on their general perceptions of the court system and factors that may cause stress immediately after trial, after participating in a post-trial debriefing, and a month after trial. Jurors had an overall positive view of the court system but did report some perceived inequities. The two most stressful elements of jury duty were related to the complexity of the trial and the ...

متن کامل

Modeling Juror Bias

We consider the implications of the definition of juror bias offered in Schwartz and Schwartz for optimal use of juror challenges to improve the accuracy of the jury process. For them, bias consists of a juror assinging more/less weight to the evidence for guilt than would be assigned by the median juror in a fully representative pool of jurors. When juror assessments of the evidence have a pro...

متن کامل

Finishing Strong: Recency Effects in Juror Judgments RECENCY EFFECTS IN JUROR DECISION MAKING COSTABIL AND KLEIN

We investigated the effects of evidence order on juror verdicts. Results from 4 mock juror studies suggest that incriminating evidence is more likely to lead to a guilty verdict when it is presented late in the trial than when it is presented early. This recency effect was found both with admissible and inadmissible evidence. Further analyses suggested that recency effects may have been mediate...

متن کامل

Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.

The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between both expert witness confidence and juror personality with expert witness credibility, as well as expert witness credibility with juror sentencing outcome. Participants were presented with one of three randomly assigned filmed scenarios depicting various levels of manipulated witness confidence. They then completed a sentenc...

متن کامل

Running head: DEFENDANT AND JUROR SOCIAL CLASS AND AGE 1 Defendant and Juror Social Class and Age: Effects on Jurors’ Perceptions of a Crime by

The presence of a jury is intended to keep criminal trials fair and objective, but sometimes jurors’ perceptions, biases, and beliefs in stereotypes affect verdicts. Defendant and juror characteristics such as social class and age, often lead to differing judgments and perceptions, but limited research has been done on the interaction between these characteristics. This study examines the effec...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

دوره 21 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1993